Your browser (Internet Explorer 7 or lower) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.

X

Wants Vs. Needs: A Review

Last month I solemnly swore to categorize each of my June expenditures as either a want or a need. Here we are on the 11th of the following month. Oops. Commencing analysis. The point of this was to stack my wants against my needs in a quantitative kind of way. Am I spending too much on my wants? Could that money be put to better use else where? It also spurred earth shattering questions such as…

IMG_6607

Beloved Atlas Garden Gloves. Want or Need? Seriously. This question, and the like, occupied more mental cycles than they probably should have. But ask yourself, are those $5 gloves strictly necessary? Once upon a time, I would’ve said no. Because I wouldn’t have used them. Or used them once for a big project. Now though? I use them every single day. For Lady wrangling and dirt digging. Sure my hands can get dirty, but those gloves make it a whole lot easier to accomplish one or two garden tasks before running out to work in the morning. When your existing pair have hole in multiple fingers, new gloves = need.

This is just an example of the mental gymnastics required to identify each of my purchases. Miser Mom may be on to something when she suggested perhaps this isn’t the right question. True and thought provoking. Regardless, its the one I asked. And I made a pie chart, which feels like an accomplishment in and of itself.

wantsvsneeds

Granted it’s not a very fancy pie chart. Still.

Noteworthy things about this pie:
There were 112 transactions total. I excluded Savings as its own category, because it’s not technically money leaving. As well as a couple of odd transactions where we were reimbursed for the expense, there by not spending any money. Originally, I was going to do a break down just on quantity of transactions. That looks like this.

wantsneeds2

I made the pie chart dammit. I’m going to use it. Turns out, two pies are better than one anyway. I already knew that.

Between the two I can see that while there were more ‘want’ transactions than ‘need’ transactions in quantity, total spent on wants was less than total spent on needs. That makes me happy. This means I made more frequent, but less expensive ‘want’ purchases. Again, happy with that. Small amounts of money spent regularly keeps feelings of deprivation at bay, while still managing to be less than the needs.

A word on those categories.

Needs included Mortgage, Utilities, Insurance, Groceries (super subjective!), Gas, Pet Food (including Chickens), Medical Expenses (dogs and people), a very necessary item of clothing, garden supplies (those gloves), gifts for people not living at this house, and one court fee.

Wants are always much more fun of course. Wants consisted of Internet, Cell Phone, Entertainment, Dining, Gym Membership, a house project, money set aside for my birthday, crap (yes, its a category), miscellaneous, and most of the cash withdrawn.

There were a couple questionable transactions. One of our pet food purchases included a definitely want-worthy item. Some of that cash may have gone to grocery necessities. Internet? Cell Phone? It’s arguable. In general, if the transactions was primarily want or majority need, thus it was categorized.

Obviously, I chickened out on providing actual dollars spent. Sorry. I’ve a strict one big reveal per week limit. Honestly, I’m just pleased as punch that my needs account for more of my spending than my wants. It does indicate a limit on my disposable income, sure. Needs represent more than 50% of our spending. If those are truly ‘needs’, that’s a high water mark under which our income can not dip. But, it’s those two categories combined that keep me married to Corporate Servitude. If I throw in a third…

WantsNeedsSavings

Things looks better. 17%, in and of itself, is a respectable number to stash away. That means I could be 17% poorer and not change my spending. 17% is a pretty hefty pay cut. It’s not the sixty or so I took once before, but its significant. That assumes of course, that I wouldn’t change my spending (I would) and that I wouldn’t continue to save (also would). Either way it’s money not in my cash flow. It’s money paving the way for our future, whatever that future may be.

My original question was “Are my wants to the detriment of my over arching goals?“. Answer: Right now, probably not. Not according to this snapshot. Not in my opinion. I could certainly do better. Most of us could. 31% or 43% wants is nothing to dismiss. This month with anotherbirthday and Urban Craft Uprising under my belt, the picture might not even be that rosy. But with all my talk of spending, I’m still saving a significant amount. I’m still taking care of my needs. I’m still using my disposable income in a conscientious way. A little reassurance on that front is worth the trouble of asking some ridiculous questions about garden gloves.

And you? What % of your spending do your wants make up? Care to guess? Or have you done the math? How do you categorize a want or a need?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share via emailShare on TwitterPin it on Pinterest

Comments

Tracy
Reply

We don’t worry about it. We each get $100 each month to spend and whatever we WANT. I categorize everything else as a need or I wouldn’t be paying for it.

Karawynn @ Pocketmint
Reply

Are you familiar with Elizabeth Warren’s books? Because I notice your percentages are very close to the goal she suggests (50/30/20).

And yes, of course I’ve done the math. :)

dogsordollars
Reply

Of course you have done the math! I expect nothing less. ;)

I am not familiar with Elizabeth Warren’s books. Any correlation is coincidental, but might be worth checking out. Honestly, I let the chips fall where they may on this one. I wanted it to be an average month, even if it meant interwebs egg on the face.

Karawynn @ Pocketmint
Reply

I’ve read both of her books — one is more of an (accessible) explanation of the economic changes and patterns that she uncovered in her academic research; the other is more of a practical guide to financial survival in the world we’re left with as a result. They both had an impact on me, and I’d recommend them wholeheartedly to … pretty much anyone in middle-class America.

Personally, I don’t consider the 50/30/20 breakdown to go far enough *for us*, given where we want to be in our lives and what we want to do. But she was writing for the masses and I think it’s a great goal for most people.

And look, you’re only 4% off target, without even trying!

Karawynn @ Pocketmint
Reply

Um, 3%. Not 4%. Sorry, writing from faulty memory instead of checking the actual chart.

dogsordollars
Reply

$100!? Tracy, I would die. We are working more at entitling ourselves to ‘funny money’ as a way to avoid bigger want purchases, but $100!? I say again, dead. dying. not possible.

It does however make me go, hmmm… might be a worthwhile experiment.

Karawynn @ Pocketmint
Reply

I had the same reaction to the $100 figure at first … since my own number is $240 per month, and while I could go lower if I had to, it would start to hurt pretty fast.

But then I realized that direct comparisons might be misleading. It was important for my purposes to make the ‘needs’ category as small as possible, which means that $240 covers an awful lot that most people might consider ‘needs’.

Tracy
Reply

Keep in mind that $100 has to be saved if you want big purchases. Golf clubs, workout equipment, clothing.

dogsordollars
Reply

Your pie would be much more impressive than my pie.

laura h
Reply

I need to save, desperately.

Leave a comment

name

email (not published)

website